Monday, July 1, 2013
If there is a place where sport and world expert collide, is certainly in the statistics. It has long been said that baseball is a game of thinking man, in part because of chess which is embedded in its structure, but also the role that math and numbers play in terms of decision each team based on individual situations. At this time, only those who work very hard to stay away from baseball recognize names like Bill James and Billy Beane. People are now more responsible for building teams and their strategies are people with advanced degrees in fields such as economics and statistics. What is interesting is how quickly advanced sabermetrics or indicators soared use and depth over the last ten years, having been almost universally derided by the major league clubs . Advanced statistics everywhere in baseball now, from the original purpose of the OPS (on-base plus rounds) WAR (Wins above replacement) to WRC + (weighted runs created) and so on. What is surprising is behind

other sports
seem to be developing their own advanced statistical systems. Take basketball for example. It would be easy to conclude that there was nothing like the development of statistical baseball professional basketball, otherwise we would have heard and knowledge that had spread as wide as it made in baseball, right?
Well, no, actually, and this is a lesson in how collaboration, open development, and construction of the ideas of others provides the most advanced results . This is the conclusion of Jason Schwartz in their preparation for the Sloan Sports Analytics Conference, where at least a discussion of measures basketball happens. This conference, now an event sponsored by ESPN, was born in what was once a simple database Yahoo was launched in 2001 by the Statistical basketball geeks. At first, as was the case with measures of baseball, the forum was opened for discussion, peer review and exchange of ideas. Unlike baseball, however, the NBA knew all about Moneyball in 2003 and the teams were very interested in the potential of advanced measures. The hotel NBA quickly realized. [Dean] Oliver, who published the seminal paper on Basketball in 2003, seven months after it hit stores Moneyball, was hired full-time by the Seattle Supersonics in 2004. Another regular council, John Hollinger, was hired the following year by ESPN - and recently became vice president of basketball operations for the Memphis Grizzlies. ESPN Hollinger concert was filled by Pelton, who, having made a name in the Prospectus basketball, spent some time talking to the management of Indiana Pacers. Roland Beech, who created the popular 82-game Web site, was hired by the Dallas Mavericks in 2009 as director of basketball analysis. (His boss, Mark Cuban, is regularly one of the biggest names in the Sloan conference.)
So you think, "Great! Teams realized Initially, unlike what happened in baseball, which means that knowledge has been adopted ", right? Well, it is true, but the result was a severe growth retardation in the statistics of basketball. Why? Well, if you know something about how patents and intellectual property often function today, you've probably already guessed.
As each statistical joined an NBA team,
share in public have become out of reach, and therefore little recently, think tank closed shop
. What were the teams that pay, after all, if new gurus statistics published their ideas online for the other 29 franchises to read? This has had a paradoxical result: Because NBA teams advanced statistical embraced so quickly, progress in analyzing basketball has really slowed down. The best minds are now all working in silos, not only can not work, but actually competing with each other





This is, again, the exact
opposite what happened in baseball . In baseball statistics because the teams were not impressed by the idea of ??progress measures, favoring instead timey explorers on the ground, the best minds were free to work together, forming what are now among the most prestigious sports statistics think tanks in history, as Baseball Prospectus and Fangraphs.
hand MLB teams were rigid enough to ignore Bill James and sabermetrics room for a full century, therefore, he and other hash ideas in open forums and public. Nothing MLB executives finally embraced statistics baseball peak, the movement was fully formed.

Find best price for : --James----Bill----baseball--

0 comments: