Monday, April 2, 2012

cyberwar offers governments the opportunity to fight wars without loss

If you write about technology, sooner or later you will encounter a smartarse who asks if I read Heidegger

The issue of technology

. Having found a number of smartarses of this type in recent years, I finally decided to do something, and got a copy of the English translation, published in 1977 by Harper & Row. Once done, I settled with a glass of liquor service and began the quest for enlightenment.

error

Grande. "To read Heidegger," writes his translator, William Lovitt, "is an adventure." Are really like to get into one of those nightmares where you wading into quicksand and whenever you take a rope or a rock that melts in your hand. It turns out that the diabolical art of Heidegger's really to lure you in like quicksand.

example, says at one point that "the instrumental conception" of technology - as a means to an end - is the "right" and the reader innocent, nodding. But it turns out that "the right still attached to something that is relevant whatever the case. However, to be correct, this fixation has no finding the thing in question, in its essence. Only at the point where this happens n ' is not the real discovery happen. For this reason, not just yet, really. "

At this point, a red mist began to obstruct the view of this player, and a few hours later withdrew from the race, thinking that while one must obviously be very intelligent to study the German philosophers, we may have to be crazy to want. But I leave with a vague impression that Heidegger thinks that technology is essentially a way of organizing the world so you do not have to experience it.

more interesting is that the stress levels of these drivers are surprisingly high. A Pentagon study has found, for example, that 29% of them suffering from "exhaustion." A co-author of the study said the Air Force is trying to recruit people who are emotionally balanced "family people" with "good values". However, "when they have to kill someone, or when they are involved in missions, and then kill them or see them dead, which leads us to rethink certain aspects of their lives."

So perhaps Heidegger was wrong: even if the type of remote control murder that is activated by drones can not completely drain the emotional significance of murder. It turns out that the contrast between the execution of a drone attack air conditioning, console a minute and after driving the family home in suburban takes a toll on those who have.

But there is a new form of warfare, where an overview of Heidegger could become more relevant. It's called cyber warfare. The ability to destroy the infrastructure of a country - to bring her food or interrupt the water supply by hacking into computers running these systems - offers the possibility of a nation to war without incurring any risk physical or psychological citizens of the aggressor: the low war free, if you wish.


Find best price for : --Heidegger--

0 comments: