One of the most frustrating things for soup debate / PIPA was how the promoters of the bill tried so hard to dodge the label of censorship. However, as Professor Derek Bambauer months kindly pointed out, any form of content blocking the government's censorship. It's just a question of whether or not
acceptable
censorship - and most people feel comfortable with some level of censorship. But SOUP / PIPA defenders often deny this ... hiding behind a claim about how because the offense is illegal, it is not censorship.
But this is not the issue any form of government censorship is based on the assertion that the censored content is "illegal" in some way.
witnessed the situation in India. A few months ago, we wrote about the Indian Minister of Communications and Information Technology, Mr. Kapil Sibal, who was apparently pushing companies Internet pre-screen all content generated by the user to stop shaking. Then, last month, some courts in India itself, these Internet companies to block content. Apparently, recently, another official - Minister of State for Communications and IT, Sachin Pilot, (whose title seems to overlap a bit with Sibal) - these Internet companies "must comply".
Well, now, is back Sibal, insisting that the government will not censor the media at all:
"I want to say once and for all, without any confusion, any government of India has never censor the media."
exception, this is not true. In clarifying his earlier statements to the same companies, Sibal said he saw "the need for a new system applied to address the content that is in violation of Indian law." But what, apart from censorship? Sibal plays the same game as the soup / PIPA advocates - insisting that the time of a certain content is illegal, may be censored, but leaving aside the fact they get to decide what is and n ' is not prohibited. Proponents of this kind of thing they like to pretend to be universally obvious what is "illegal" and it is not, and will never be the legitimate content - as political commentary - once would falsely reported as illegal. But, after seeing exactly what happens too often (even using false copyright) is a very legitimate concern.
Sibal What is he saying here is that the government will not censor the content they think is right. But if people in government do not think is right, will be declared illegal and censorship. It takes a lot of his unequivocal statement about censorship, not
Find best price for : --
internet----
India----
Sibal--
0 comments:
Post a Comment