Sunday, February 26, 2012
( treatment of ideas, inventions, content, etc. as a form of "property" - in the spirit of copyright and many supporters of the patent system), simply did not agree with
has
reality
(where almost everything is a derivative work of some type). What does it very well the video is to highlight the hypocrisy of it all. As pointed out brilliantly when
that
aa copy
(and everyone makes a copy), which justify it. When copying others, however, suddenly attack and vilify. A recent example of this first course was the defense flamboyant former New York Times, Bill Keller Executive Editor of the copy of the New York Times and the publication of a work for someone else covered the Copyright few days after his own column came out in support of stricter enforcement of copyright.
As he points out, it is psychologically understandable. It is "loss aversion." People feel a sense that "own" something that is really not - and often dictated by the concepts of intellectual property that really spread the idea that you can actually have an idea (and yes technically not the right copyright and patents are applied directly to the "ideas", but that's a nuance that most people do not understand when they see how the content and inventions are considered "property" under TODAY ' Today laws).
Find best price for : --ACTA----Kirby--
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment